A Free Press and Constructive Opposition: Pillars of Democracy Under Scrutiny

A Free Press and Constructive Opposition: Pillars of Democracy Under Scrutiny
Hon Afenyo

The role of a free press and a vibrant opposition in sustaining democracy has once again come into focus following criticism from the Majority Chief Whip over the Daily Graphics editorial decision to feature the Minoritys stance on a matter of national importance.

The controversy stems from the newspaper front-page coverage of the Minority concerns regarding mass job terminations. The Majority disapproval raises pressing questions about press freedom and the space for constructive opposition in Ghana democratic landscape.

Under the previous NPP administration, opposition voices then led by the NDC were frequently given front-page coverage in major media outlets, including the Daily Graphic. At the time, no similar concerns were raised about bias or attempts to undermine the government. This historical precedent underscores the essential role of the press in providing balanced coverage and ensuring that all perspectives, including those critical of the government, are heard.

The current backlash against the Daily Graphic editorial choices suggests a worrying trend where government-aligned figures seek to dictate media narratives. Such actions challenge the foundational principles of democracy, where dissent and alternative viewpoints must be allowed to thrive.

The Minority, in response, has reaffirmed its commitment to holding the government accountable, advocating for transparency, and ensuring that public discourse remains open and unrestricted. They argue that rather than attempting to suppress scrutiny, the government should engage constructively with criticism and address the concerns raised.

In a democratic society, a free press is not a tool of any administration but a safeguard against unchecked power. Similarly, a responsible opposition is not an adversary to be silenced but a necessary counterbalance that strengthens governance. If the government takes issue with critical coverage, the solution is not suppression but open dialogue and accountability.

As Ghana continues its democratic journey, the nation must decide: Will it uphold the principles of free expression and robust debate, or will it allow growing pressures to erode the very pillars that sustain democracy